Don’t Cry for Argentina: $16 Billion Judgment Overturned
- Event-Driven.blog

- 3 days ago
- 3 min read

On March 27, 2026, a US appeals court threw out a jaw-dropping $16.1 billion judgment against the country over its 2012 takeover of state-run oil company YPF SA. President Javier Milei is thrilled, calling it "the greatest judicial victory in national history." The truth is, they never left us - or at least, they're not leaving with $16 billion of Argentina’s money.
Here's the backstory: When Argentina nationalized YPF more than a decade ago, former shareholders weren't happy and decided to sue. They argued that the seizure violated YPF's by-laws, which required a tender offer to shareholders. In 2023, US District Judge Loretta Preska agreed with them and awarded the massive judgment. With interest piling up, the total had grown to over $18 billion. High flying, adored - or so the plaintiffs thought.
But the appeals court saw things differently. In a 2-1 decision, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals found that Judge Preska had gotten Argentine law wrong. US Circuit Judge Denny Chin, who wrote the majority opinion, explained that while Argentina had clearly broken promises to foreign investors, under Argentine law itself, the shareholders' claim wouldn't have flown. During earlier arguments, Chin had even questioned whether this was the right venue, musing, "How would we be feeling about letting Argentina decide on issues against the US?". A new Argentina, indeed.
This is absolutely brutal news for Burford Capital Ltd., the litigation funder that bankrolled the lawsuit hoping for a big payday. Their stock took a nosedive, plummeting 47% to $4.14 - at one point it was down as much as 54%. Ouch. From the rainbow high of an $18 billion judgment to this? Burford now has to write down the value of this case in its books, though they're still figuring out exactly how painful that's going to be. CEO Christopher Bogart wasn't hiding his disappointment, calling the decision "a remarkable abandonment of the rights of minority NYSE shareholders."
Burford had been playing the long game, hoping the outstanding judgment would be such a headache for Argentina that they'd eventually cave and settle - kind of like what happened when Argentina finally settled with Elliott Management after a bruising 15-year fight over its 2001 debt default. They'd been chasing Argentine assets all over the world and Judge Preska had even ordered Argentina to hand over its 51% stake in YPF to cover the judgment. That order was paused during the appeal and now looks like it's dead in the water.
For Argentina, this is genuinely huge. We're talking about a judgment that equaled nearly half of the country's entire 2024 government budget. Argentine officials had been adamant that paying it would wreck their economy. President Milei refused to even negotiate with the plaintiffs, which created this tense standoff that could have seriously complicated Argentina's plans to sell bonds and access international markets again. Robert Giuffra Jr. from Sullivan & Cromwell, who led Argentina's legal team, summed it up nicely: the ruling is "incredibly important to Argentina, to President Milei and to the country's recovery," removing something major "that was hanging over the government of Argentina.” It's a victory from Buenos Aires to Manhattan.
Now, this might not be completely over. Burford says they're weighing their options, which could include appealing to the full Second Circuit, taking a shot at the US Supreme Court or pursuing investment treaty arbitration. But those routes could take months or years, and honestly, their odds of ever seeing that money look a whole lot worse now than they did a week ago. For now, at least, Argentina has won the legal tango.





Comments